West Midlands PoliceA father and son who “recruited” a woman from the US in a plot to kill a Birmingham shopkeeper have been jailed.
Mohammed Nazir, 30, was sentenced to 32 years for conspiracy to murder while Mohammed Aslam, 56, was told he would serve 10 years.
Aslam and Nazir wanted to kill the owner of a clothing shop after a dispute in 2018 which left the pair injured.
A suspected hitwoman, named as US citizen Aimee Betro, is currently in prison in Armenia and subject to an extradition request.
Betro allegedly attempted to shoot the shopkeeper’s son during the attack, at a home in South Yardley on 7 September 2019, but the gun jammed.
The father and son, from Elms Avenue in Derby, were convicted following a trial at Birmingham Crown Court in the summer.
Nazir was found guilty of conspiracy to murder and possession of a firearm with intent to cause fear of violence. He was also convicted of perverting the course of justice and illegally importing firearms.
Aslam was cleared of a firearms offence, but on Monday was found guilty of conspiracy to murder.
Revenge attack
The court heard the father and son, who smiled at members of their family when they appeared in the dock, had been involved in a “serious disorder” in Alum Rock in July 2018, where they both sustained serious wounds.
In the case of Aslam, he suffered injuries to his brain – something which continues to affect his cognitive function.
The 2018 incident involved shopkeeper Mahumad Aslat and members of his family and led to the windows of the defendant’s family home in Derby being smashed later that day, the court heard.
Judge Simon Drew said it remained unclear why the families had fallen out but it had formed the motivation for the 2019 conspiracy.
The judge explained Nazir had recruited Ms Betro to carry out a “deliberate and planned” revenge attack on Mr Aslat and his family that would have “amounted to an execution”.
“I think that it would be overstating the case to call what took place a contract killing, however the evidence suggests Aimee Betro was rewarded for taking part,” the judge said.
“That seems to be the most likely explanation for why she became involved.”
